Sorry I’m
running late again. I seem to do that a lot, don’t I...?
I was going
to do a whole piece on character building this week (since nobody suggested
anything else). But it kind of felt wrong.
We talked about characters at the Writers Coffeehouse this month, and
we’re going to talk more next month, and I always feel a little odd addressing
Coffeehouse topics here on the blog. Especially close to the same time.
Yeah, not
everyone here goes to the Coffeehouse, but still... One way or another, it feels kinda cheap. To me, anyway. It’s just how I’m wired. Like I’m
re-using material here or there, giving one group minimal effort.
But while I
was writing out the character piece, I thought of a new angle I wanted to
explore. The more I thought about it,
the more I was sure it could be a post all on its own. A new take on character development.
So, here’s
an easy question I should be able to answer about any of my characters.
What are
they not good at?
Seriously. This shouldn’t be hard. Can I name five or
six things my character isn’t good at?
No, not ridiculous things like “gene splicing” or “space shuttle repair”
or “aboriginal dialects.” Just name a
couple basic things your character isn’t good at.
Let me make
it personal.
I’m
terrible when it comes to pretty much any kind of sports. I don’t know players, teams, leagues,
anything. I can name a few New England
teams, just because I grew up there, but even then I’d be pretty pathetic.
I wish I
was more musical. I love music, but have
never been good at music, if that makes sense. Horrible at telling music genres/styles
apart, can’t play anything more complicated than a triangle. Hell, in high school I played bass drum in
the marching band, and a couple people can vouch for the fact that I screwed that
up sometimes.
I’m really
bad at taking compliments, on any level.
People telling me I have nothing to worry about is pretty much
guaranteed to freak me out. I’ve been a
full time writer for ten years, my ninth novel is coming out this year (plus
the new collection this week) and I still have a ton of career anxiety.
Anyway, I
could go on and on, but you get the idea, right? I’m not a perfect person (not by a long
shot). Most people aren’t.
And, if I’m
doing it right, my characters are people too. So there should be things
they’re not good at. They should have
bad habits that cause problems. There
should be fields of interest they know nothing about. Blind spots to political/cultural ideas. Phobias that mess them up. You’ve probably heard of these referred to as
character flaws. It doesn’t mean
there’s anything blatantly wrong with the character. It just means they’re... well, human.
If I’m
doing this writing thing really well, these areas where my characters have
problems are going to cause specific issues in this story. Maybe even a few plot points will hinge on
them. And my characters are going to have to learn and grow and change to get
past these problems. They’ll have to make an effort to overcome fears, work past prejudices, and maybe figure out
new ways of doing things.
That’s a
good thing. It’s called a character arc. You’ve probably heard of those,
too.
Now, let me
address a couple of quick points, if I may...
There are
those folks who believe, well, more is better. Their characters don’t have a flaw, they have
flaws. And they don’t really have flaws, they have faults. And I use “faults” in the geologic,
California-drops-into-the-Pacific sense.
Yawning, bottomless chasms. Each
character generally has six or seven of these.
Maybe a baker’s dozen. These
people don’t just have feet of clay. They have feet, ankles, calves, knees, thighs.
hips, groins, and lower abs all made of wet, soft clay.
Yes,
groins. There’s no way someone this
screwed up doesn’t have a ton of sexual issues.
That’ll come up, too. Or... maybe
it won’t. One out of five...
Again, this
isn’t unrealistic. I’m willing to bet
most of us have known one or two really messed up, annoying people in our lives. I’ve known a couple.
As I’ve
often said, though—reality isn’t our goal as fiction writers. Think of
that messed up person from your own life. How much time did you really want to spend with them? Would you want to read a short story about them? A whole
novel? Sit through a two hour movie?
Y’see,
Timmy, there’s nothing wrong with an overly-flawed character, but I need to
balance that with the realization that my readers need a reason to like this
person. A reason to keep reading. It
doesn’t matter how beautiful or artistic my prose is, the majority of people
aren’t going to want to read about an awful character who’s a failure on every possible level.
If someone’s going
to have serious flaws, they need some serious strengths, too, to counterbalance
them. A grocery clerk who gets blackout
drunk every weekend to forget her past isn’t that interesting, but a popular billionaire
philanthropist who gets blackout drunk every weekend to forget her past...
well, that probably got you thinking of story ideas right there, didn’t it?
Also, to
got to the other extreme, nobody likes the flawless character. Seriously. I’ve talked before about some of the problems
with characters who are never caught off guard or never get scared. What’s the challenge going to be for someone
like that? If Dot is always ready,
always prepared, always calm, and always wins (of course she always wins—how
could she lose?)... well, that’s going to get boring really quick. And unbelievable. When somebody’s ready for absolutely every
contingency—especially when there’s no real reason for them to be—it just gets
ridiculous. Plus, there’s no space for
character growth. If I’m already at ten in all categories...
what kind of arc can I have? Where can I go?
There’s a
wonderful line in the first Hellboy movie—“We like people for their
qualities, but we love them for their defects.” I think that’s extremely true
of fictional characters. The more well-rounded
they are—with strengths and weaknesses—the more we’ll be able to identify with
them. And care about them. And want to
read the next book about them.
Which is
what we all really want to happen.
Next time...
Okay, look,
I’ll be honest. Next week’s my
birthday. There’s a good chance I’ll be
drunk the entire day. Possibly the night
before, too.
But... if I
manage to be sober somewhere in there, maybe I’ll talk a bit about shutting up.
Until
then... go write.
The map icon reminded that Superman: The Movie is such a good film with excellent writing and acting. Luthor and Otis are interesting characters, largely because of their faults.
ReplyDeleteLex Luthor: Everything west of this line is the richest, most expensive real estate in the world: San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco. Everything on THIS side of the line is just hundreds and hundreds of miles of worthless desert land, which just so happens to be owned by...
[Whacks Otis with his pointer]
Otis: Uh... Lex Luthor Incorporated.
Lex Luthor: Now, call me foolish, call me irresponsible, but it occurs to me that a 500 megaton bomb planted at just the proper point would...
Superman: Would destroy most of California. Millions of innocent people would be killed. The west coast as we know it would...
Lex Luthor: Fall into the sea. [Gives a little wave with his hand] Bye-bye, California. Hello, new west coast. *My* west coast.
[Otis overlays map with new map]
Lex Luthor: Costa Del Lex. Luthorville. Lexington. Marina Del Lex. Otisburg. Lex Springs... Otisburg?
Otis: Miss Teschmacher's got her own place.
[indicates "Teschmacher Peaks"]
Lex Luthor: *Otisburg*?
Otis: It's an itty bitty town.
Lex Luthor: [Angry] OTISBURG?
Otis: Okay, I'll wipe it off. Just a little town, that's all.
[Erases Otisburg]