Hope you
all had a wonderful Halloween, Guy Fawkes Day, or respective eerie holiday.
As some of
you know, I’m a bit of a geek, and as such I’m very excited for the release of Thor:
The Dark World tomorrow. And
since I’m always willing to be pop culture relevant—and I’m really slammed
with other stuff right now—I thought I’d post a fun conversation I had with
Justin Theroux, who wrote the third of the “Wave One” Marvel movies, Iron Man
2. Justin was great to talk to, even
when he had to bite his tongue about some still-secret plot points and reveals. He also had a very positive and realistic
view of working in Hollywood and working on a major tentpole movie (a sequel in
a set of interlocking movies, at that).
A few
points, but you’ll probably figure it out as it goes. I’m in bold, asking the questions. Keep in mind a lot of these aren’t the exact,
word-for-word questions I asked (which tended to be a bit more organic and conversational),
so if the answer seems a bit off, don’t stress out over it. If you see a long line of dashes
(------------) it means there was something there I didn’t transcribe,
probably because it was just casual discussion or something I knew I wasn’t
going to use in the final article for one reason or another (there are off the
record discussions now and then). Any
links are entirely mine and aren’t meant to imply Justin was specifically
endorsing any of the ideas I’ve brought up here on the ranty blog—it’s just me
linking from something they’ve said to something similar I’ve said.
By the very
nature of this, there will probably be a few small spoilers in here, though not many. Check out the
movie if you haven’t seen it yet. It’s
fun and you’ll get a bit more out of this.
Material
from this interview was originally used for an article that appeared in the May/June
2010 issue of Creative Screenwriting Magazine.
So, anyway,
here’s me battering Justin with questions about Iron Man 2.
--------------------------------------------------
So... how does
someone go from being an actor to screenwriter on a huge comedy to the sole
writer on Iron Man 2?
(laughs) Your guess
is as good as mine. I don't know. I've been in Hollywood for about twenty years
now. I don't know if that's
overnight. Everyone has a weird road in
this town and mine's no different, I guess.
Everyone has a weird little story to tell.
Have you been writing
all along?
I have, yeah. If I
were to thank anyone or lay it at anyone's feet, it would be Ben Stiller who's
always been a very big champion of mine and always convinced me to do something
professionally. So Tropic Thunder was
the first thing we were able to do together.
He was the one who first looked at my pages, years and years ago, and
said 'These are really decent pages. You
should be doing this more.' He was the
one that gave me the confidence. So much
of anything in the entertainment industry is confidence, and he was the first
one to inject me with that.
Are you two friends?
We met... I was doing a play that he came and saw here in
New York. We met after the show and he was
very flattering and I was very flattering to him. I adored some of his earlier MTV shows and
sketch work and The Ben Stiller Show
I thought was an unbelievably good show.
So I was gushing about that. We
sort of became friends over that. That
was in... 94? 95? Four, maybe?
Somewhere early '90s.
Were you a comics fan
as a kid?
Yeah. I was and am a
comic book fan. I wasn't one of those
comic book fans who ran out every week and bought whatever new issue was out
there. I sort of came into it backwards. I read a lot of underground comics--Heavy
Metal, Art Spiegelman, that kind of thing-- but I also was an avid Spider-Man
and Iron Man fan when I was a kid.---So I was a fan. Not as probably die-hard as you might think,
but I am a fan of the genre.
I had worked with Robert on Tropic Thunder and we had
worked very well together and got along.
So he was the one who brought me over to Marvel. He said 'You should meet with Marvel. You guys should sit down and see if you have
any common ground because I think it would be a good fit.' So I did.
I went when they were first gearing up for the very, very first initial
push into development for Iron Man 2. I sat with them for a long time and had long
discussions with them about the character and that world. We just hit it off. It was a good match. Shortly thereafter they said they'd love to
have me and I was completely flattered
and floored, and we started developing the script right away.
Jon Favreau and Robert
Downey Jr. both said early on, if I remember, they didn't want to be involved
if there wasn't going to be time to do a good script. Were you already on board at that point?
Yeah. I don't
know. I don't remember when they said
that, but it sounds completely in line with the way those guys think and
work. They're amazing quality control,
both of them. As is Marvel. They were extremely hands on, even in the
creation of the story. It was enormously
collaborative. I never felt like I was
abandoned to write the script by myself, even though I did the actual
writing. There was always someone to
bounce ideas off of. Kevin Feige, Jeremy
Latcham, Jon Favreau, obviously, and Robert, they were always there to lob in
their ideas and support. It was a very
socialist endeavor, the creation of the script.
I think the writing teams
for the first film (Art Marcum & Matt Holloway and Mark Fergus and Hawk
Ostby) had a couple of years working with Jon Faverau. You came on and they already had a release
date for the film and less than a year before they started filming, yes?
(laughs) You try to
forget. While you're doing it you really
try not to realize the pressure you're under.
You try not to focus on it, at least.
You have to fake it and pretend you have all the time in the world to
create it, because if you put a calendar and start X-ing days off you'll go
crazy. I sort of operated, as we all
did, I think, where it's like 'Well, we'll deal with that when we get to it.' As we had to turn in pages to effects and the
line producer, we did a lot of punting of things until we absolutely had to try
to move the ball across the finish line.
What's your method? Are you an outline guy, do you
use note cards, do you just like to shuffle it all around in your head, start
on page one, and plow through?
I don't know. I love discussing things with people, almost
to a fault sometimes. I'll bug a bus
driver if I really want someone's opinion.
The way I love to work is with someone who I trust knows the material,
like Favreau and Feige, and bounce ideas off them. Those guys had the benefits of doing [the
first Iron Man] and were well-versed
in the pitfalls and problems of where certain ideas could take you. They were great at helping me eliminate
certain things. They could dismiss
things that otherwise I might waste time spinning my wheels in. That being said, when it actually comes down
to writing I prefer to just wake up in the morning, make a cup of coffee, and
just sit down and start hammering pages.
I write fat, usually, and hope the director can help guide me. In this particular case Jon was good at
guiding me towards what -------- on the one hand you're trying to create a
script that matches what Favreau’s vision is and what he wants to do. I'm a big believer in being in service to the
director as much as possible.
So you don't use any
outlines?
No, no, we did plenty of notecards and outlines and all the
rest of that. I think at a certain point
you just have to start trucking through the deep snow and shoveling your way
into it. Or out of it.
How much did Jon actually
get to work with you on this? Was there
time for the two of you to sit down and work the story, play with characters,
that sort of thing?
Yeah, we met every single day in pre-production. He was doing Couples Retreat for
portions of that. So we met very often,
these epic sessions where we'd all—me, him, Robert, Kevin, and Jeremy—we'd sit
in that room and beat through it. Then
I'd go away and do pages, come back, we'd beat through it some more, and I'd go
away and do pages. It was a very unified
effort. We were all pulling on the same rope.
It was the way this movie had to work just because of the time frame.
What about Robert
Downey Jr. Did he have thoughts of his
own for the script?
Yeah, absolutely.
Many days we met up at his house and scribbled stuff on cards.
Was it all for
him? Was it overall ideas or ideas for
Tony Stark action and dialogue?
It was everything.
He' got such an insane--insane in a great way--of working. He's just an idea generator. He's like a firehose with a powerful
stream. He's one of those guys who's
just constantly percolating with new ideas and pushing into different areas and
places where you didn't think it could go.
There were certian idea he would have and you'd think 'That's completely
insane. There's no way we could get away
with that.' He'd stick to it, and we'd
write it and rewrite it, and we'd show up on the day and he'd perform it
and--Oh, I get it. That totally makes
sense. He's the one who has it in his
head. There's a lot of lightning firing
off that guy.
How long does it
normally take you to get a draft?
I honestly couldn't tell you. Even though we had a production draft that we
ended up working off of, we were still developing whole chunks of it as we were
shooting it. Once we had the schedule
for what we were shooting, we then knew we could go back in and since this is
towards the end of the shoot we can go back in and really start finessing it. So I was working on stuff on set all the way
up until the very last day of shooting.
Now, how much of this
was laid out for you from the start?
There was some stuff hanging there from the first movie, of course, but
did you come on and it was already "Okay, we want Whiplash, Justin Hammer,
the Black Widow, War Machine, the briefcase armor... give us a
story."
No, no, no. To their credit, they really do give everyone
involved in the process a blank slate to start with. And that's a blessing and a curse. I think in the end it always ends up being
beneficial to them. You go in knowing
anything is a possibility and they don't shut any doors or windows to what you
want to do until it becomes either cost-prohibitive or just doesn't make sense
with the brand.
They're
firm believers that the fans are the shareholders in this whole thing, so they
go in with the attitude of what do people want to see. It's not necessarily about what we want to
do, it's what people are expecting and what they want of this character. And that's a wonderful way to work,
especially in this genre. Everything was
on the table and then it was just a question of taking things off the table.
We opened
up all the characters. We opened up
Whiplash and all the famous villains of the past and started picking up each one, rolling it around in meetings, and going "What about this guy? What about that girl?" We ended up getting three new characters for
this movie--Whiplash, Black Widow, and Justin Hammer--and realizing there was a
very powerful dynamic between those three.
How did you end up
with Whiplash?
Y'know, there was a bunch... I won't bore you with who we
were looking at—translate 'bore you' as 'get in trouble'. It was really Jon's idea. I think Jon, very early on, had the idea of
using Mickey. We have sort of an energy
theme going on, sort of a confluence of many things. One is, our Tony Stark is a public
figure. Two, we knew we wanted to have
this energy element to it. What is the
thing that's inside him? Could this
thing become public? Could it get out
there? It's an arms race,
essentially. Then when we were looking
at the different characters, we were thinking where can we sort of plug that
idea into a character, and Whiplash—through Jon's vision of what that character
could be or become--what we all gravitated toward. Weall thought that's the guy. Once Jon had pitched the way he envisioned
that character, which is very different from a guy with a big ponytail and a
cape, we thought that's very cool. These
big energized whips emenating from his center chest piece. It all, organically, started to take
shape. With the back story we thought we
could have some fun there.
Now, in the first
film one of the main elements was that Tony Stark had the only viable mini-Arc
Reactor fused into his chest, plus there was one other one that would work for
twenty minutes or so. In the trailers we've
got Iron Man, War Machine, Whiplash, plus what looks like a whole squadron of
armored soldiers fighting them at one point.
Again, it sort of followed that.... If we walked into the room with anything,
when we first started to develop, the one thing that was obviously on the table
that we could not ignore was that he was a public figure. That was the first little piece of clay that
hit the table that we knew we'd have to build off of. We thought, well, what comes with that? What comes with that is a strange kind of
arrogance, especially in today's world, that that's definitely going to entail? Some kind of a newfound celebrity, to have a
guy who's a public superhero. So there's
sort of an arrogance to Tony at the beginning of the movie that he's the only
one who is in possession of this technology.
So then the next dramatic device is... what if he's not? What if someone else can create it as good as
he makes it, or almost as good? That's
where we went with that. What if the
genie got out of the bottle?
War Machine is a
little unusual because he's not part of the "classic" Iron Man
stories. Rhodey is, of course, but War
Machine was a much later addition. Was
this a concern, for you or the studio, since most of the successful Marvel
movies seem to deal with classic elements more than newer ones?
I don't want to talk about other's people's movies but...
War Machine is not a dark force. Our
thinking was Tony is out in the world and has perhaps bitten off more than he
can chew. One of the themes of the movie
is can one man be an island? Are men
islands in themselves, especially if you're Tony Stark? Again, without giving away too much, the War
Machine armor and who's using it really complements that idea or that
theme. I found it a relief to have that
character in the movie. And obviously
Don is wonderful. Only in the fact that
they're such good friends does that work.
Were you worried
about the Batman issue? Or I
guess, Daredevil, since we're talking Marvel... That there are just so many character and
elements crammed in here that there wasn't going to be room for a coherent film
story?
I wouldn't say I was worried. There were times where I felt that we had a
luxury of riches. It was like putting a
bunch of desserts out in front of you an wondering which one you wanted to
taste first. It never worried me in that
way. If anything, it just made me want
to work harder at servicing every one of them.
But I think we've done a pretty good job of tempering that and making
sure that it doesn't just turn into a Jackson Pollack. Everyone has a purpose in the film, and I
think as long as each one of those characters is well-defined and as long as
they're purpose-driven, then at the end of the day it just feels like a great
big fun movie as opposed to a big, y'know, clusterfuck. (laughs)
There's been some
talk lately that this movie takes place before the Incredible Hulk movie which came out... well, at the same time as
the first Iron Man.
(laugh) I feel like
Marvel has a great tradition of screwing the next writer. (laughs) I think initially, when they first started
interweaving it, things were considered afterthoughts. Now—I don't want to give away things
happening in other movies—they're starting to put a lot more thought into it
and seeing it as a larger scheme. We
have things in our movie that are doffing their hats or perhaps telegraphing
things that are going to happen in other movies. That's probably a much as I can probably
say. It wasn't like we had a big meeting
with Kenneth Branaugh about Thor. There's just enough cross-pollination to make
it interesting, but not enough to start eating into other people's sandwiches.
Was this something
you were trying to figure out, how it all fit together, or did someone in an office just say "oh, this is
the order?"
No, we knew we were going to have Nick Fury. He showed up, you just can't ignore it. And
then there's much smaller clues and things that we seeded throughout that will
play out in other movies. Obviously once
Avengers is up and running you'll
start to feel the cumulative effect of those little jigsaw puzzle pieces
getting put together.
I know there was also
a point no one was sure if Samuel Jackson was going to be in the film or
not. Was that affecting you and your
story?
Yeah. For me, I just
acted as if he was doing it. We were
putting him in. He was going to go
in. It was up to the powers that be to
make that happen. I just kept writing as
if he was going to show up on the first day.
Did you get a lot of
notes? Were you under the microscope,
because the first film had been so successful?
Yes, but not in a way...
Marvel is a very special place.
Kevin Feige is probably the biggest comic book fan I've ever met. He's the biggest fan of his material. He is, without question, one of the best
keepers of that torch. There would be
times when we'd be bumping our heads or going 'I don't know how to make this
work," and Kevin would bring a clarity to the situation. I've never experienced it with any other
studio or any other creative process, where--literally--the head of the studio
would be the one to go 'No, you know what the fans want? The fans want this, and at this moment in the movie this is what needs to happen and this is what we're forgetting." He-- and Jon, too-- was great at just
refocusing it. He knows his brand and he
knows his charcters so well. He's one of
those guys who can tell you the day and date he saw this character or that
issue came out or that movie premiered.
He just knows everything. He's
encyclopedic. I was always eager for him
to put his two cents in an I would eek out his counsel on a regular basis.
Did the internet have
a big influence on this? Either for you
or the studio. Since the first movie
people have been going crazy on the web with ideas and speculation, even more
so once images and footage started appearing.
Does it affect your writing?
For sure. Websites
like Superhero Hype and IGN. I wouldn't
say it's an internet-made movie or anything close to that-- because a lot of
time people have ideas that have no bearing on what's ultimately possible-- but
definitely. There were times... As I
said, the modus operandi of Marvel is
that the only shareholders are the fans.
There'd be times when they would say 'Oh, I read this thing, they'd be
stoked if this happened.' So we know
we're not on the wrong track pursuing that idea. That's really interesting and fascinating
because it sort of puts a ghost partner in the room with you. A shadow voice in the room.
Last question for
you... now that Iron Man looks to be
a successful franchise, did you leave some threads and ideas dangling for
another sequel? I know a lot of folks
saw the Ten Rings terrorist group in the first movie as a hint towards the
Mandarin...
I'm not confirming or denying that remark. (laughs) I think that's still in the distant
future. I would say if people looked for
it they would definitely find it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.