Amazon’s
Shelfari service sent me an interesting email alert the other day. It seems their algorithms had found a new
character in Ex-Patriots and wanted to let me know it was being added to the list on Shelfari. What character had they found?
St. George of Arnold
Schwarzenegger.
I’d just
glanced back at the book recently, so it only took me a moment to figure out
where they’d found this. From page 89 in
the paperback version...
The soldier straightened up from the crouch he’d landed in, a move that reminded St. George of Arnold Schwarzenegger traveling from the future in the Terminator movies.
This is
also a great example of why I would never trust a computer to write for me.
Yet a lot
of would-be writers do trust their computers. And other people’s computers. They use subroutines and apps and websites to
do all the hard work for them. They
never bother to learn how to spell—or even what some words mean—and just remain confident a machine will catch all of that for them. It’s the literary equivalent of choosing to
walk with a crutch over training to run a race.
And it’s
hard to say I’m dedicated to being a professional runner when I announce I’ve
decided to keep using the crutch. People
will have trouble taking me seriously.
And, speaking as someone who was stuck with one for a while,
moving with a cane or crutch gets dull really fast. For everyone.
Take that as you will.
I mentioned
last time that I was going to bring up some words every author needed to
know. Are you ready for them? The words I should absolutely, no-questions
know if I want to call myself a writer...
All. Of.
Them.
Words are
our tools and our raw materials. Our
bricks and mortar. Our paint and
brush. A surgeon doesn’t use the same
blade for everything and a chef doesn’t use the same spices in every meal. A huge part of the reason we consider people
to be professionals is because they know the tools of their trade. If I want people to consider me a
professional writer, I need to know words.
All words. I need to know how to
spell them, what they mean, and how to use them.
Oh, sure, I can string some words together and argue that people will get most of it from context. Maybe sometimes I’ll even get an emotional response (the one I was intending). But this is crude, base communication. It’s campfire stories that depend on a loud scream at the end to deliver their punch.
Oh, sure, I can string some words together and argue that people will get most of it from context. Maybe sometimes I’ll even get an emotional response (the one I was intending). But this is crude, base communication. It’s campfire stories that depend on a loud scream at the end to deliver their punch.
Which
brings us, as always, to the list...
Here’s a
bunch of words that sound kind of similar but all have very different
meanings. Some of them are different
parts of speech. Some of them are
homonyms. Some of them aren’t (which is
even more embarrassing). More to the
point, a spellchecker will accept all of them as correct... no matter how I’m
using them.
As usual,
every one of these is a mistake that I saw in print. They were all in news
articles or short stories or books. All
of them were seen by thousands (or is a few cases, dozens) of readers. In all fairness, one of them is a mistake I
made in an early draft that went out to my beta readers and they all rightfully
mocked me for it.
How many of
them do you know?
alter vs. altar
balled vs. bawled
Calvary vs. cavalry
censer vs. censor
cruller vs. crueler
explicit vs. implicit
instants vs. instance
manners vs. manors
past vs. passed
wrecking vs. wreaking
rational vs.
rationale
packed vs. pact
bale vs. bail
raise vs. raze
phase vs. faze
lamb vs. lam
isle vs. aisle
pus vs. puss
Did you
know all of them? Both sides? None of these are
obscure or unusual. I’m willing to bet most
of you reading this have used at least one of them today. I think I’m already up to five or six.
If I want
to call myself a writer, it’s important that I know the tools and raw materials
I’m using. All of them. Because if I’m talking about the rational the
bad guys have for wrecking havoc on stately Wayne Manner while Alfred balled
his eyes out...
Well, I
don’t look like someone who should be making a living with words, that’s for
sure.
Next time, I might be a little late while I try to get these rewrites to my editor. But once that's done, I’d like to talk a bit about how I’ve chosen to end my latest rant each week.
Until then,
go write.
yay, i like this game! Do we win a no-prize if we get all the words? :)
ReplyDeleteAnd the one I just ran across: bread instead of bred. Nothing like glaring typos and word confusion to take you write out of the storey.
ReplyDeleteLast night I just hit one in a book... draught instead of drought. One letter, almost dead opposites.
ReplyDeletehad a good one yesterday! Persecution instead of Prosecution. In an email from a lawyer, no less. ;)
ReplyDeleteHello Peter. Just listened to that awesome Raksura music on Martha Wells' site. So dramatic, so haunting. I could listen to that music all day. Actually, I'm listening to it right now in my office. I interviewed Martha for Diabolical Plots and would like to interview you. About writing advice and about your Ex-Heroes series. Can't find contact info for you on your writing advice blog. I'm in China (I teach ESL), so I can't contact you through Facebook, Live Journal, etc. Hope this message gets to you.
ReplyDeleteCarl Slaughter
moreheadalumni yahoo