You all
understood that last paragraph, right?
Context and all that? Cool, and
the spell-checker says it’s okay so I’m just going to call that good...
No,
wait. If we go that way I’ve got nothing
to talk about this week.
Hot tip for
the week. Spelling matters. Last week I mentioned there are
certain things that are always right and wrong.
Spelling is one of them. There’s
no quicker way to tell an editor or reader you’ve got no idea what you’re doing
than to have a lot of spelling mistakes in the first few pages of a
manuscript. And if I’m going to put a
lot of effort into double and triple-checking the first ten pages, I might as
well act like a pro and check them all.
Hot tip
number two. Every spell-check program is
an idiot. They can be outsmarted by my
almost-one-year-old nephew banging on the keyboard with his eyes closed. If I decide to take on an idiot as a writing
partner, whose fault is it when there are mistakes in my manuscript? Heck, we’ve all been stuck with an idiot at
work at some point in our lives, yes?
But did we ever depend on the idiot? Did we let everything ride on the idiot doing
their job, or did we cover our butts and make sure everything was getting done
regardless?
Now, there
are those people who try to say spelling and grammar don’t matter. If the story’s good, you should be able to
enjoy it even with a few typos and malonyms and failed parallels and so on. And there’s some truth to that. I’ve enjoyed a lot of stories with two or
three typos in them.
What I
haven’t enjoyed are stories that have two or three typos on the first
page. And the reason I haven’t enjoyed
them is because I stopped reading at that point. Just like any other casual reader will. In the few cases I’ve been required to read
the rest of the manuscript, I usually found that the writer who couldn’t be
bothered to learn how to spell also couldn’t be bothered to write a remotely
interesting story. No big shock there.
Another argument
I’ve seen a few times is that spelling and grammar and conjugation are all
arbitrary anyway. There isn’t a “right”
way to spell words, it’s just a set of rules some people made up and decided
everyone had to follow. Of course, by
that logic, there aren’t any real rules to football--those were just
made up, too. So next time you play a
friendly game of football with your friends, try giving hockey sticks and cricket bats to your linebackers. Please let me
know how it goes over with everyone.
And there’s
also a few folks who try to use first person as an excuse for
typos. “It’s not me, it’s the character
who doesn’t know how to spell.” The
problem here is that a reader can’t tell the difference between deliberate mistakes
and accidental ones. All they see on the
page is a mistake, plain and simple. And
a manuscript loaded with mistakes is going to be one that probably ends up in
the big pile on the left.
Soooooo...with
that in mind, let’s take a look at some of the ways wanna-be writers proved
they didn’t know how to write. As
before, I remind you that all of these are actual typos I’ve come across. Most of them more than once. To be honest, almost a quarter of these came
out of one particularly incoherent screenplay I had to read. One came from the first paragraph of a
proudly self-published book whose author claimed the people mocking his
spelling were just jealous because they’d never written a book. And one I’ve seen repeatedly at a much larger
website that likes to put up posts about stupid spelling mistakes people
make...
heel and heal – one of these is a command to a
dog
beet and beat – two reds--your kid should not be one of them
vale and veil – one of these often refers to
death
bare and bear –one of these means to endure or
tolerate
here and hear—one of these is where you are
right now
minuet and minute—one of these means small
can’t and cant—one of these is a secret
language
pedal and peddle—one of these deals with
motion
strait and straight—one of these refers to
waterways
trusty and trustee—one of these is a person
moors and mores—one is social, one is ethnic
sheer and shear – one means to slice,
the other means perpendicular
cloths and clothes – one of these is made into
the other
site and sight—one is found on a firearm
profit and prophet—one of these is often
religious (don’t be snarky)
imminent and eminent —one will be happening
soon
baited and bated—you don’t want your
breath to be one of these
calender and calendar—one is a tool, the other
is a machine
essay and assay—only one of these in a verb
breath and breathe—only one of these is a verb
domed and doomed – one you’re screwed, one
you’re protected
ramped and rampant—one of these is just out of
control
trader and traitor—one sells loyalty, one
sells goods
surely and shirley—this writer never saw Airplane...
nee and knee—married women are sometimes
addressed this way
tied and tide – one of these will have to hold
you over until later
It’s also
worth noting that—much like my first paragraph up above--none of these words
are spelled wrong, which is why spell-check programs ignore these mistakes when
a writer makes them. They’re just the
wrong words, period. The only mistake on
the spell-checker’s part is that it assumes the writer knows what the hell
they’re doing and there’s a real reason you put down moors when you
meant mores. Of course, as I
mentioned before, the spell-checker is an idiot...
Y’see,
Timmy, using shear when I mean sheer is no different than calling
that new girl Elizabeth when her name’s Andrea—in both cases I look like an
idiot who can’t be bothered to learn the right word to use. Or like someone who trusted an idiot to get
these things right.
I’ve said
it before, I’ll say it again—get a dictionary.
You’ll retain more searching through a dictionary than you will by
tapping change or ignore on your spellchecker. There’s some nice ones on Amazon, or
you can probably find one cheap at a used bookstore. Don’t worry if it’s a couple years out of
date—99% of the words are the same. The
big red one on my desk is from 1997 and I’ve never had a problem with it.
Next time
I’ll probably just have a quick tip for you.
Assuming I don’t start overthinking it and freeze up or something.
Until then,
go write.
Oh, and seriously, you need to go check out Springfield Punx, the fantastic site where I found the Casey Jones image. Dean spends his free time Simpson-izing superheroes, sci-fi icons, and whatever else strikes his fancy.
ReplyDeleteyeah, i had to go find my dictionary. Fortunately it was underneath a box of chocolates, so that worked out well for everyone. :D
ReplyDeletespeaking of words btw, where the heck did "snark" come from? We don't have that in the UK. I've heard "sarky", which (i've always assumed) was short for "sarcastic", but where'd "snarky" come from?
You had chocolates?
ReplyDeleteI've heard "snarky" for many, many years over here. The story I heard (which seems to fit) is that a snark is a snide remark, which resulted in backformed adjectives like snarky.
In all fairness, it's not in my big red dictionary.
I routinely send comments to my webcomic artist friends, letting them know when they've misspelled something, used an "eggcorn" (see http://eggcorns.lascribe.net/), or just chose the wrong word. Most of these are well-received, though one guy has a kvetch-page for people who send him typos, which I think is a bit pointless.
ReplyDeleteIf you're going to send someone a criticism, even if it's only to let him know that he just used a Grocer's Apostrophe, do it kindly, or you may be on the receiving end of a long, drawn-out scream of invective.
As for snarks, one must of course charm one with smiles and soap. Unless it's a boojum, in which case one should run; it is likely not good eating anyway.