I went back
and forth over the title for this week’s little rant. It felt too easy to go this way. Hopefully you’ll find it in your hearts to
forgive me.
I wanted to
take a few moments to talk about redemption tales. Someone asked about this a while back—a long
ways back, I believe—and I thought it could make an interesting post. Redemption is tough to qualify, though, and
it took me a while to put my thoughts into some form that, well, anyone else
would comprehend.
That
happens to me a lot.
Which
brings us to today.
One key
thing I’ll be bringing up a lot for this is empathy. A good redemption story relies heavily on me
knowing how my readers will respond to various incidents and actions. If I don’t have a good idea how something
will go over, it’ll be easy for either end of my redemption tale to seem
pointless, confusing, melodramatic... or all of the above.
A
redemption tale can either be the main thrust of my whole story or it can just
be part of a single character’s arc. Either
way my story has to hit a couple of points.
Not in the sense of “introduce the motivating incident by page 17,” but
more in a general “let’s talk about the story and the characters” way. If I don’t have these points in mind, there’s
a good chance that my “redemption” story is going to earn some rolling eyes and
a hearty laugh or three.
So... with
all that in mind.
1—Does my character need to be redeemed?
This is one
of those “obvious” things that far too many folks mess up. If I’m going to tell a redemption story about
Yakko, he needs to do something that requires redemption. This is step one, and it’s kind of bothersome
how often I see people who miss this point.
I’ve seen
more than a few folks who try to structure big redemption moments around
characters who haven’t done anything wrong.
It’s really great that Yakko wants to sacrifice himself to make up for
his past sins, but if he doesn’t have any past sins... well.. That’s not redemption, it’s just a pointless
sacrifice. Yakko needs to have something in his past (or do something early in my story) for which he needs some form of
honest redemption. For most of this
post, I’m going to call that the key event.
That “past” aspect is important, but I’ll get to it in a few minutes...
That “past” aspect is important, but I’ll get to it in a few minutes...
This is my
first big empathy moment as a writer. If
I can’t predict what actions (or lack of actions) my audience will see as
redemption-worthy, this story can get silly pretty quick. Yakko should not be going on a ten year
penitent crusade around the world to make up for feeding his cat tuna instead
of chicken. If he’s really guilt-ridden
about that nickel he picked up off the sidewalk when he was six... again, I’d
better be writing a comedy.
What was
Yakko’s key event? Did he sneak a peek
at his roommate in the shower? Write a
bad check? Get someone fired? Rape or murder someone? Maybe lots of someones...?
That brings
us to...
2—Can they be redeemed?
Somewhat
related to the first point. There are
certain acts that are unforgivable.
That’s true in any society, past, present, or future. Sometimes people do things that are beyond
redemption. It’s really tough to imagine
anything a serial child rapist could do to make up for what they’ve done in the
past.
Yeah, I’m
sure some of you are thinking “they could die,” but that’s not redemption, is
it? That’s vengeance, and that’s not what we’re talking about. And I’m going to talk about death in a little
bit.
So when I’m
writing Yakko’s redemption tale, I need to really think about what he’s
done. Again, some of this is going to be an empathy issue. Will my readers think his
key event is a redeemable act?
3—Do they want to be redeemed?
Again, this
may sound obvious, but I can’t force redemption on someone. That’s not how it works. Yakko needs to want it.
And maybe
he doesn’t. Maybe Yakko doesn’t feel
like he did anything wrong. Perhaps he
paid his fine or wrote his apology letter or served his time and considers the
matter closed. Or maybe he knows it was
wrong and just doesn’t care. Some people are like that. If Yakko’s one
of them, it’s going to be tough for me to write a redemption story about him.
4—Why haven’t they done it before?
Okay, in
order to explain this point, I want to toss out what I think is a fairly firm
rule of thumb... Feel free to agree or
disagree down below.
In a good
redemption story, a notable amount of time needs to pass between the key event
and the redemption for that event.
Y’see,
Timmy, in my opinion one of the main elements of redemption (from a story point
of view) is guilt over the key event.
If I don’t feel guilt, then why would I want redemption (see
above)? And if I’m taking care of things
immediately after the key event, this isn’t so much redemption as it is...
well, cleaning up. Yakko may feel
horrible about having to do this clean up, but does he really feel guilty? If I hit someone with my car, it’s the
difference between calling 911 and sitting with them until the ambulance
comes... or switching my headlights off and speeding away. I may feel bad in both situations, but
they’re two very different situations.
That being
said... Why didn’t Yakko stop
immediately? What made him run from his key event? What’s kept him from admitting it or doing
anything about it until now?
Denial? Fear?
Which
brings us to a two-part point...
5A—Why are they doing it now?
If I accept
that Yakko has tried to disavow or hide that key event for weeks or months or
years... why is he looking for redemption now?
What’s changed for him as a character that he’s decided to acknowledge this and make amends somehow?
This is
another big empathy moment because this is a big decision for any character,
and it goes against what they’ve done up until this point. If this isn’t a believable change
of heart, my whole story’s going to fall apart.
5B—Why are they doing it now?
From a story structure point ofview, why is this happening now? Odds
are Yakko’s going to start looking for redemption in this story, because I write
about active characters who actually do things.
So, as an author, why have I included this?
Am I just
looking to round out Yakko a bit as a person?
Is this the main plot of my whole novel? Either way, this decision and the
repercussions from it need to fit into the structure of my story and
into Yakko’s arc as a character.
Last but
not least...
6—Does it balance the scales?
At the end
of the day, every redemption story comes down to this. Does what Yakko did now make up for what he
did then? Does he believe it does? Do other character think things are even now? Even more importantly, are my readers going
to think this is a fair trade off, or is it going to come across a little thin or forced?
It’s worth
mentioning death. All too often writers
try to use death as the ultimate balancing agent. It’s seen as the automatic “redemption now”
act. Sure, Yakko raped, killed, and
pillaged his way across three continents, leaving thousands physically or
emotionally scarred in his wake, but in the end he died saving those two
campers from a grizzly bear. And that
makes it all okay, right?
No, of
course not. In fact, if not handled just
right, death can come across as a “he got off easy” situation, cowardice, or
even a cop-out on my part. I don’t have
to deal with all these complex emotions and repercussions if Yakko takes a trio
of bullets in the chest, but I can still be praised for my artistic handling of
the situation.
That’s the
idea, anyway.
On a
related note, a redemption story where the character doesn’t redeem themselves
in the end is just... well, kind of pointless. It may have been very pretty from a
vocabulary-metaphor-symbolism point of view, but it isn’t a redemption
story. Or much of any story, to be
honest. I may feel it’s beautifully
tragic and ironic, but I think most readers are going to find themselves
wondering why they just wasted the past few hours following a guy who doesn’t
accomplish anything...
And there
you have it. A few questions I need to
ask myself if I’m trying to do a redemption story. And if I don’t have some positive answers for
most of them, well, maybe I need to look again at how I’ve set up my
story. Or my character.
Because
there’s a good chance they’re not on the road to redemption.
Next time
I’d like to work backwards a little bit.
Until then,
go write.
I missed this one first time around. I pretty much agree with everything here. By coincidence I was watching "The Angels Take Manhattan" which was the last Doctor Who episode with my least favorite companion.
ReplyDeleteAmy Pond had great legs but her personality always irritated me. She was vain, selfish and teated her husband terribly, but managed to be magnificently unselfish in her last appearance.
It struck me that there are stories in which redemption isn't earned as much as it is given. Robert deNiro's character in The Mission is like that. He starts as a slaver, then repents and starts dragging around a bundle of armor. Bit I don't think the audience really forgives him until one of the Indians he has victimized cuts his burden loose.
ahh, i think i see where i'm going wrong in my current story... *scribbles notes* Thanks as always for the good advice!
ReplyDeleteMatthew--I think that's a good point which I'd been thinking of but failed to make in my sixth point. There are a lot of stories where the character in question may not believe they've redeemed themselves, even if the other characters/ readers/ audience think they have.
ReplyDeleteAnd, yeah, I always went back and forth with Amy Pond, too. There were times she was fantastic and other times you just couldn't figure out why the Doctor liked her so much.
Rakie-- Very glad to finally be of use to someone. :)